RE:Interesting timesHello ridethewinners
You stated, "The analyst reviews are out, Nat Bank at $8, RJ at $6, Echelon at $8.50 and Beacon at $6, Paradigm holding at $13 .75"
RESPONSE: A l of that and three bucks would buy you a coffee somewhere. LOL!
They are all likely facilitating some of their "high net worth clients" selling short GRA shares at the moment; ergo, I couldn't give two shakes of a lambs tail about what those paid shills think about NanoXplore's share price.
You also stated, "I Liked the comments on VoltX, it was a smart move to not commit to this venture too soon, in hindsight that would have been a big mistake. It sounds like 50/50 whether it gets built, and where. If Canada does not come up with matching subsidies they may have to shelve or build in the US to get the benefits available there."
RESPONSE: It was a smart move to wait until everything required to build and operate the merely proposed and never really seriously pursued graphene comprised battery cells manufacturing facility is now stratospherically priced and the far too long ago determined "various cost assumptions" are entirely obsolete and now absolutely useless?
Surely you jest ridethewinners.
As per some guy named Soroush Nazarpour over at the NanoXplore reddit forum, the recently proposed 100 to 200tpa Graphene-Silicon anode material manufacturing capacity facility is going to produce said materials and sell primarily to this nonexistant VoltaXplore enterprise, at a price of $10.00 per Kg. Do the math Einstein. See what kind of revenue generation could be produced by selling manufactured anode materials to a company which does not exist and conceivably will not exist for at least two to three years from now.
Clearly, unless and until another primary customer (e.g. SAMSUNG or any other company) is willing to purchase said anode materials from NanoXplore in the meanwhile, there is no use in building (ready and producing during 2023 said Mr. Soroush Nazarpour) a 100 to 200 tpa manufacturing capacity Graphene-Silicon anode materials processing and manufacturing facilty, i.e. unless Mr. Nazarpour plans on having NanoXplore donating 100 to 200 tpa of said anode battery materials to his catered to and non-revenues generating "solid state: battery materials "research facility".
You stated, "As much as everyone was excited about this, the CEO has shown restraint, not easy to do amid the fanfare of the EV wave."
RESPONSE: The CEO has shown "restraint", you say?
He could have and did fool plenty of us, i.e. Mr. Soroush Nazarpour was grining like a Chesh·ire cat during that interview he recently partook of, leading up to the Q4 and fiscal year end financials being released. He even made special mention and took special note of the intentionally generated interest held by NanoXplore shareholders in the now infamous, merely disingenuously proposed and intended as a "lure" and "hook" VoltaXplore battery cells manufacturing facility enterprise.
You, ridethewinners, went on to state, "There was a post earlier talking about the gift of shares, it did not and does reflect at all on the financials of the company, it has to be reported because SN is an insider but it is not relevant to GRA."
Don't try to be cute ridethewinners.
What I said was directly as pertains to the then proposed question and probability being that had NanoXplore itself awarded and booked the expense of issuing the circa 3.4 Million worth of NanoXplore shares to the former CFO, Luc Veilleux, no ability to post a positive adjusted EBITDA would have been possible. What's more, we knew then that the very two persons who would have known this best, the CEO and CFO, were the very two "insiders" who transacted amongst one another the circa 3.4 Million worth of the NanoXplore shares award in question, a.k.a. "The Nazarpour Gift".