Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

I-80 Gold Corp T.IAU

Alternate Symbol(s):  T.IAU.WT | IAUX

i-80 Gold Corp. is a mining company. The Company is a gold and silver producer engaged in the exploration, development and production of gold, silver mineral and poly-metallic deposits. Its operations include Lone Tree, Ruby Hill, Granite Creek and McCoy-Cove. The Company owns a 100% interest in the Lone Tree and Buffalo Mountain gold deposits and Lone Tree processing complex (collectively, the Lone Tree Project). The total land package of the Lone Tree property consists of approximately 12,000 acres. The Ruby Hill Project is an advanced-stage development project with residual heap leach production, located within the Battle Mountain-Eureka Trend. It owns a 100% interest in the Granite Creek gold project located at the intersection of the Getchell gold belt and the Battle Mountain-Eureka Trend in Humboldt County, Nevada. It owns a 100% interest in the McCoy-Cove project. It holds a 100% interest in the FAD project located along the Battle Mountain-Eureka Trend in Eureka County, Nevada.


TSX:IAU - Post by User

Comment by metalhead666on Apr 11, 2023 5:13pm
42 Views
Post# 35389439

RE:RE:RE:Another Failing Grade for AlwaysLong683

RE:RE:RE:Another Failing Grade for AlwaysLong683The only reason I can see for raising an additional $400 million would be to go directly to phase 2. I don't think it would cost that much given it's incremental to phase 1 that they're building now.  If they did plan this then it could increase production to nearer 500k ounces per year as throughput would double and they would be capturing the higher grades from phase 1

500k ounces is what a major looks for.  Barrick didn't go after Skeena because it wasn't in the 500k ounce league. Artemis might be thinking to go there in one fell swoop

I'd be good with that.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>