RE:RE:Clear message from shareholders not named GSFCFor what may well be an extremely complicated endeavour, the rhetoric certainly continues with little progress.
Admittedly, the only vested parties are GSFC and the remaining Phinney advocates who withheld their vote, the balance of the shareholders who are along for the ride are indifferent.
What will the lawsuits like so many other resolve? Nothing more just unnecessary expenses.
On the Nitrogen question that has been championed for a few years and whether GSFC does not want to invest or be the sole operator, my recollection is that the proposed change in the name was related.
As for standard potash pricing f.o.b. Vancouver, Mundi certainly has been stuck at $202.50 for a while.
There is plenty of blame to go around and not what is going to solve anything with…. Just a lot of opportunists who have all waked away with big payouts on the management side over the course of the company’s existence.
It boils down to a simple exercise? Who, if anyone will jump in to move any of the projects forward? If no one and regardless they need to divest or change exchange will keep going in circles on the notion of great returns on an incredibly complicated an astronomically expensive transaction.
Happy Canada Day!