RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:mdjbrown...agree, be it today or 30 years ago on a posting I never claimed that LABS was not working with a firm or firms that are themselves working on NDA or 505B2 submissions. What I claim is that those firms can be working on the efforts without making submissions and thus LABS can claim they are working with companies that themselves are supporting those efforts.
Marketing isn't a tough concept but it is clearly lost on some. LABS has never publicly stated that a full NDA or 505B2 submission was made by a partner. On materiality alone that would be the minimum required. Naturally they wouldn't have to get specific on who or even what (as with the ANDA submission to protect confidentiality especially given the ongoing litigation), but given that litigation isn't likely for the NDA or 505B2 submission, one could wonder, what is stopping LABS from making a statement about those efforts in a NR like the ANDA.
Since they haven't made one means it hasn't happened. Marketing materials are NOT press releases.