Post by
lawnmoredan on Sep 18, 2005 12:05pm
Debating the Outlook on Uranium
Debate is good,confirms direction good or bad.Nothing worst then a bunch of yes men masageing ego's.Dines point is one I'am investing on and have done extremely well so far todate on uranium stocks.But one must keep there eyes open to the real threats to this concept.Pebble reactors-the use of "Thorium" instead of uranium,to mention two.China has and is perfecting the use of the "PEBBLE REACTOR".India has reactors useing thorium now as we speak.The pebble reactor,holds its uranium in 8 or 9 gram balls(300-450,000) surrounded by a special graphite I see as using substantially less uranium per year then conventional reactors.The pebble reactor holds its uranium for a "THREE YEAR" period before needing to be refilled.This to me means these types of reactors "if" they become widely accepted,will use substantially less uranium per reactor,also they can be easly tooled to run on thorium instead of uranium.Bush is looking intensely at the pebble reactor concept.
Comment by
oakesy on Sep 22, 2005 11:38pm
I dont know anything about thorium but if it has to be mined then there`s the chance to invest in it.
Why is Thorium better than Uranium . Cost?
Comment by
Grant12 on Sep 23, 2005 10:22am
I just read a post the other day that said thorium is $150/oz. Heeluva lot more $$$$ than uranium.
Comment by
lawnmoredan on Sep 23, 2005 11:48pm
Some interesting reading regarding -Thorium https://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,68045,00.html
https://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1471875,00040006.htm
https://www.cavendishscience.org/bks/nuc/thrupdat.htm