Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Osisko Mining Inc T.OSK

Alternate Symbol(s):  OBNNF

Osisko Mining Inc. is a Canada-based mineral exploration company. The Company is focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of precious metal resource properties in Canada. It holds a 50% interest in the high-grade Windfall gold deposit located between Val-d'Or and Chibougamau in Quebec and holds a 50% interest in a large area of claims in the surrounding Urban Barry area and... see more

TSX:OSK - Post Discussion

Osisko Mining Inc > The worst deal in Canadian mining history
View:
Post by DaveG999 on May 02, 2023 12:55pm

The worst deal in Canadian mining history

GFI " ultimately represent an investment of C$1.2 billion to acquire its interest," yet only $959mm is acounted for in this news release.

The market acted as if it knew this was coming for 3 weeks, implying heavy insider selling. That happens to be a crime. 

Why is shareholder approval not required for a deal of this size?  

Why did the stock lose nearly 20% at the open. 

Why is GFI up 5% when it is the acquireor and OSK  down 6% when gold bullion is up $33 for the day (1PM)

Why was there no news conference in Canada explaining how C$1.2 is the value here, implying $2.4b value for the entire company.

Why didnlt' the compnay continue to drill with the money it had just raised to command a higher price for its shareholders - on the cusp of a major increase in the value of its product?
Comment by houbahop on May 02, 2023 3:26pm
From the PR, Gold Field is paying: (all amounts in CAN$) To Osisko: $300m + $300m (year 0), $17m (year 1) and 17m (year 2). Total: $634m To the JV: $250m/2  (pre-construction) + $789m/2 (construction). Total: $520m Total cash invested by Gold Field: $1.154B Osisko will be paying $520m to the JV for pre-construction and construction. The value of the JV with gold at $2 700 CAD / oz 3.2m ...more  
Comment by DaveG999 on May 02, 2023 3:53pm
Thanks for that.  What we have is the introduction of an entirely new entry they call 'pre-construction costs', not in the summary of the FS on the website of $250 million.  The capital cost remained steady at $789 million. At the least that would be a failure to disclose. And shareholders still have no clue of what that $250 million actually covers. And why it was left out of ...more  
Comment by houbahop on May 02, 2023 4:14pm
Dave, Osisko could not have develop the mine by itself. Here they have the perfect partner and he pays $634m just to sit at the table. It gives Osiko the financial strenght to pay for its 50% share of the cost to develop the mine + some leaway without borrowing a dime.. Payback in 1.5 years? No mine can do this. Where have you seen this? After all this time working to find a partner, I think ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities