Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Invesco Water Resources ETF T.PHO


Primary Symbol: PHO

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the NASDAQ OMX US Water IndexSM (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index seeks to track the performance of companies that create products designed to conserve and purify water for homes, businesses and industries. The underlying index may include common stocks, ordinary shares, American depositary receipts (ADRs), shares of beneficial interest and tracking stocks. The fund is non-diversified.


NDAQ:PHO - Post by User

Comment by billy4325on Aug 17, 2017 1:10pm
207 Views
Post# 26592524

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:2nd quarter earnings

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:2nd quarter earningsI'm guessing this is just a difference in how the R&D costs are presented in the financial statements.  Last year PHO paid $1mil for the quarter in royalty payments to Photon R&D (which is extremely close to the increase in normalized operating costs).  This was allocated to cost of goods sold.  This year, instead of paying royalty fees to the related company (which was incurring the R&D/other expenses), PHO incurs these expenses itself.  These are now allocated to operating expenses rather than cost of sales (as it is no longer under a royalty agreement to the related company).  This is also at least in part what lead to higher gross margin % compared to the same quarter last year. 

Moogul wrote: Is nobody worried about the doubling in operating costs compared to last year (AFTER removing all 1 time items)?  I struggle to see this stock raising earning materially. FCF should still be there but I'm little skeptical. I believe we may continue to consolidate for awhile. Just my 2cents.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>