Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Pivot Technology Solutions Inc. T.PTG

"Pivot Technology Solutions Inc offers IT solutions to businesses, government, education, and healthcare organizations. It operates through the following segments: ACS, ARC, ProSys, Sigma, TeraMach, Shared services. The company derives the maximum revenue from the ProSys segment which sells storage, server, and IT infrastructure consulting solutions to enterprises. Geographically, it derives majority revenue from the United States and also has a presence in other countries."


TSX:PTG - Post by User

Comment by Boolishon Dec 21, 2013 10:40am
148 Views
Post# 22029873

RE:Question

RE:Question
That 108 million was just thrown out there if there was 100% uptake in the conversion deal. Right now the public float should be around 101 million with the 25% whom have elected to convert. That leaves 66 million of the pref's who have either not decided or are likely to go for the conversion deal because essentially it is a better bang for your dollar. If at this point since only a 1/3 of the notes are convertible and we get 100% uptake on the remaining 75% we would be left with 122-23 million in the float when all is said and done. So why would one convert now when essentially they are only getting 50 cents on the dollar to do so. 1) Fund mandates which don't allow for certain types of debt instruments. 2) They see more upside in the stock? My guess is when this deal was proposed by the board that the majority of big holders were already onside....more than 50% That would include Sculley, McMillan etc. It was quite obvious AGF for whatever reason did not want the notes. SO they have given notive and possibly one more large holder like Fulcrum? So the news yesterday didn't really change anything for me. Those 25% would have taken the 1 for 1 whether it was end of Jan or end of Feb. It did push back the timeline however for clearing this structure cap by a week. If you check Canada stockwatch there has already been a jump in the float from these conversions. Conversion does not necessarily mean liquidation that's for sure or there would be way more pressure on this thing. That's my read....anyone else care to take a stab?
Bullboard Posts