RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Client B phase 1Thank you Midtown, I didn't know about the 90 days, but here we are about 110 days since the last update on Client B NR of 7/2
MidtownGuy wrote: The securities regs dictate a continuous disclosure update requirement, of 90 days, on previously announced information. So whatever was the last date on which PYR formally discussed pending contracts or modelling, count to 90 and another NR will appear on the topic. Extensions can be requested.
StairwayTo wrote: A follow up on the 7/2 NR would be nice.
"Updates in its Iron Ore Pelletization Torch Business"
Client A, B , C
Pitpitcolisse wrote: My guess is tjat new modeling completion might not be considered a "material" news to disclose after receiver draft contract from bigger client A but it could be worth a question to Peter on Agoracom.
StairwayTo wrote: Pitpitcolisse wrote: I think that it is included in the "nothing has fallen off the track" statement. Don't think there was anything specific mentionned in regard of their modelling.
StairwayTo wrote: Do we know where the modelling phase 1 is at for client B?
6/11 NR mentionned 6 to 8 weeks
Looking back at PR, phase 1 completion for client A took 8 weeks.
Just wondering why after 18 weeks for client B we haven't heard anything.