RE:Bcsc,you have always been negative on PYR and HPQ...The comment yesterday was not in reference to PYR, which was abundantly clear to anyone with basic reading comprehension skills.
I believe you have confused being negative with being realistic.
Shall we look at the post you quote from 2017, FOUR years ago and update it.
AM/3D powders: still not lucrative, no significant revenue at this point. Hopefully in the next 3 to 6 months.
QRR still not lucrative. Pilot plant to be commissioned in Q4. Hopefully in the next 6 to 9 months will be lucrative.
Dross recovery has sold multiple systems to a mideast client. No action on the tolling arrangement with the Japanese Entity. Potential contract for 3 systems has been referenced.
Waste disposal: Contract for 2 systems for US Navy signed last year.
With a 5 year build cycle for aircraft carriers, the disposal system while a money maker cannot be described as lucrative. Similarly the destruction of warfare agents has a limited market and no news for years. So why am I posting the same "BS" ?
Well it would seem that 4 years later 90% of what I posted is still true.
Yes there are additional technologies (iduration torches, NSiR, Fumed Silica) but none of them are proven AND lucrative at this point. The other thing that is still true is that nothing (or very little) will happen in the time frame put forth by the UncleRons on this board. Some things are taking much longer than I envisioned. And if you must know I am still a shareholder, I currently hold 80% of what was my holdings, having sold 10% at 10 x cost and another 10% at 25 x cost. I have been using some of the proceeds to trade a few thousand shares of PYR for fun and have been successful so far in part because I know where this is going long term.
Welcome Back Kong
Kongratulation wrote: That is you yesterday...
bcsc wrote: I hate to burst your bubble but there are an awful lot of stocks that it doesn't matter how long you wait. Sometimes we mistake stubborness with patience. I hate to say it because it makes me sound like the real mckoy but.. You gotta know when to hold'em, know when fold'em
This is a random negative post from you in 2017...
.
bcsc wrote: uncleronstips wrote:
bcsc as usual twisting the positive to negative. I said "the big difference is, PyroGenesis is diversified." the Am / 3d powder is proven , the QRR is proven to make at minimum 4 nines, the dross recovery is proven, the aircraft waste disposal is proven, the destruction of warfare agents is proven, I would say you are proven to be full of cr@p. The contracts are coming , the revenue will increase, the finances will become positive , and there are more irons in the fire in many very lucrative markets that PyroGenesis is primed to make money from. It's just a matter of time till Iam proved right and you will slither off to bash on another BB.
What you said was:
PyroGenesis is diversified with at least 7 proven & lucrative niche markets. Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.pyr/pyrogenesis-canada-inc?postid=26933441#kYjfuzCgGotcMJZK.99
Just as I quoted the first time. So please tell me which of the technologies you refer to are currently both proven and lucrative?
The AM /3D powders may become lucrative, hopefully in the next 3 to 6 months.
The QRR may become lucrative, hopefully in the next 6 to 12 months.
Dross recovery hasn't sold a system since the first over 2 years ago.
With a 5 year build cycle for aircraft carriers, the disposal system while a money maker cannot be described as lucrative.
Similarly the destruction of warfare agents has a limited market.
The 3D powder and QRR stories are good enough to sell themselves. They don't need your constant pumping or cheerleading, especially when it includes statements which distort the truth.
So why are you still posting the same BS ?