That is you yesterday...
bcsc wrote: I hate to burst your bubble but there are an awful lot of stocks that it doesn't matter how long you wait. Sometimes we mistake stubborness with patience. I hate to say it because it makes me sound like the real mckoy but.. You gotta know when to hold'em, know when fold'em
This is a random negative post from you in 2017...
.
bcsc wrote: uncleronstips wrote:
bcsc as usual twisting the positive to negative. I said "the big difference is, PyroGenesis is diversified." the Am / 3d powder is proven , the QRR is proven to make at minimum 4 nines, the dross recovery is proven, the aircraft waste disposal is proven, the destruction of warfare agents is proven, I would say you are proven to be full of cr@p. The contracts are coming , the revenue will increase, the finances will become positive , and there are more irons in the fire in many very lucrative markets that PyroGenesis is primed to make money from. It's just a matter of time till Iam proved right and you will slither off to bash on another BB.
What you said was:
PyroGenesis is diversified with at least 7 proven & lucrative niche markets. Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.pyr/pyrogenesis-canada-inc?postid=26933441#kYjfuzCgGotcMJZK.99
Just as I quoted the first time. So please tell me which of the technologies you refer to are currently both proven and lucrative?
The AM /3D powders may become lucrative, hopefully in the next 3 to 6 months.
The QRR may become lucrative, hopefully in the next 6 to 12 months.
Dross recovery hasn't sold a system since the first over 2 years ago.
With a 5 year build cycle for aircraft carriers, the disposal system while a money maker cannot be described as lucrative.
Similarly the destruction of warfare agents has a limited market.
The 3D powder and QRR stories are good enough to sell themselves. They don't need your constant pumping or cheerleading, especially when it includes statements which distort the truth.
So why are you still posting the same BS ?