RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:The Wrecking Crew…..Mostlyserious wrote: Graham, what Paul is saying is that if you follow data or information provided by the company and your sound assessment of this leads to a wrong decision, that is on you.
What Paul is saying is that you are responsible for making all investment decisions and should not make them using information like you do.
He can correct me if I am wrong, but that is how I made decisions and he is therefore implying that I should have put zero trust on that information. I agree. But I kind of have to trust something out there and generally live by "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice,shame on me". Both come at an expense, and the first one is not quite in my moral repertoire.
Got it. To add to that, you have to believe that the source of information is credible. There have been many times, where people have extended the results, and made forward looking statements, which can lead to false conclusions for sure. It is also not determined yet whether or not, there was information that was not available to shareholders, that should've been, as alleged by AMF -time will tell.