RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Well ... as i see it ...Mostlyserious, Kjs4381,
Didn't Mr. Pascali also renegotiate the Phoenix Haute Technology Inc deal with Pyro?
I understand where you're coming from. It definitely not the norm. You and I know it, everyone knows it. The ceo knows it , so you have to ask what was so beneficial to pyrogenesis that the ceo agreed to this? If you say to yourself, it must have been very big and go with that thought, and let's say it benefits pyrogenesis in the long term 50 million. Is that worth it? A 100 million? The answer obviously is we don't know what the ceo knew when he agreed. He felt it was worth it and still does. For me, I'm excited to find out. Glta
"You and I know it, everyone knows it. The ceo knows it , so you have to ask what was so beneficial to pyrogenesis that the ceo agreed to this?" CEO agreed; moreover, the board agreed to it. Can one still question who calls the shots?
Good luck to All!
kjs4381 wrote: Mostlyserious wrote: I have seen countless business partnerships. I cannot recall any starting like this especially between two companies that are at the opposite spectrum in size and the smaller one making the sacrifices. So, I am really curious to hear the explanation and see the end results. I am not quite sure that I can envision an explanation whereby paying the bill years after it was initially due (granted, renegotiated) had no other avenues.
The thing is that we really don't have a good indication when that full explanation will come.
I understand where you're coming from. It definitely not the norm. You and I know it, everyone knows it. The ceo knows it , so you have to ask what was so beneficial to pyrogenesis that the ceo agreed to this? If you say to yourself, it must have been very big and go with that thought, and let's say it benefits pyrogenesis in the long term 50 million. Is that worth it? A 100 million? The answer obviously is we don't know what the ceo knew when he agreed. He felt it was worth it and still does. For me, I'm excited to find out. Glta