Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Quarterhill Inc T.QTRH

Alternate Symbol(s):  T.QTRH.DB | QTRHF

Quarterhill Inc. is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in providing tolling and enforcement solutions in the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) industry. The Company provides end-to-end mobility systems to some of the tolling authorities in the United States, including in Texas, California and Illinois through Electronic Transaction Consultants, LLC (ETC). ETC’s core products... see more

TSX:QTRH - Post Discussion

Quarterhill Inc > North Star vs Micron
View:
Comment by WinnerCircle948 on Nov 30, 2021 8:25pm
Both cases closed. https://litigation.maxval-ip.com/Litigation/DetailView?Caseid=DbfBCaeL-2Y%3d
Comment by Capharnaum on Nov 30, 2021 9:12pm
Looks like North Star has decided to dismiss their appeals 20-1295 and 20-1296.
Comment by cabbieJBJ on Nov 30, 2021 8:29pm
WinnerCircle, what does thus mean. It's dated March 2020.
Comment by WinnerCircle948 on Nov 30, 2021 8:37pm
CabbieJBJ, Sorry! Those links were supposed to be on the same post. W
Comment by cabbieJBJ on Nov 30, 2021 9:42pm
W, Help.  Would you be good enough to claify the significance of these two dismissals.  FRAP 42(b) is a voluntary dismissal.  Why would North Star move to dismiss?  I can't find anything in Docketbird on the 20-1296 and 20-1296 cases.  Ditto for the CAFC opinions and orders. However, there is a CAFC order dismissing a North Star appeal of a PTAB decison (case 20-1874) ...more  
Comment by ChiChi3 on Dec 01, 2021 8:24am
Could it be that North Star and Micron came to a settlement but IMS continues their litigation with Micron?  I don't see why not... Chi
Comment by WinnerCircle948 on Dec 01, 2021 10:11am
I honestly don't know, cabbieJBJ, no settlement and this case is still active a week later.  Hope a comprehensive deal is in the works. W
Comment by Capharnaum on Dec 05, 2021 11:17pm
This may or may not be related, but Micron has decided to settle with UMC in November after a long battle. Hopefully, they also settled with Wilan and this would explain why they withdrew the request. Here's a link to the news of Micron settling with UMC: https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/biz/archives/2021/11/27/2003768571
Comment by astutein on Dec 06, 2021 3:43pm
Capharnaum--Thanks for post. May or may not be related .  But i would like to point out the following: POLARIS AND UMC ENTER LICENSE AGREEMENT MARCH 31,2020. UMC IS CLIENT OF OURS MARCH 31,2020. MICRON AS ABOVE SETTLING WITH UMC. MAYBEE?????    
Comment by Capharnaum on Dec 07, 2021 10:02am
If UMC is a client, QTRH might have been a participant to the settlement between UMC/Micron which would explain why their would have dismissed their appeal.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities