RE:RE:RE:RE:The funny part is
"without risk mitigation programme." You have confirmed that statement with the company? Or are you just making it up / presuming? You may have realized a little GLOBAL PANDEMIC is going on with 2nd/3rd waves and variants flaring up across the world...Look at Canada (Ontario)'s situation, look at India, look everywhere. It seems to me that STGO was able to bring cyanide into country to commence production last year at the height of the 1st Covid wave despite the locked borders with China - this seems to me to be the tangible value of having strong in-country team and relationships at all levels of government. Obviously, STGO does not control (nor does any company in any country anywhere) the supply chain, nor national policies/restrictions related to COVID. We will have to wait and see. Do you not see STGO's recently announced early procurement of long lead items for ph2 expansion as a risk mitigation measure in itself? Do you not see reduced use of cyanide during the coldest winter months so as to more efficiently use these resources in the warmer weather (given the unpredictability of Covid and potential supply chain issues) as a risk mitigation measure? I think it is safe to assume those running the company, who also have significant investment interest in the company (insiders hold a lot and have not sold a single share), will make operational decisions (including risk mitigation) in the best interests of the company, its employees, and LONG TERM shareholders. Short-view "day traders," who want a quick buck and then out, may not like the day-to-day decisions, but I am ok with that! I am sure the company is open to your risk mitigation expertise if you don't agree with the couple examples I suggested and you have your own expert mitigation recommendations? I would certainly love to hear them on this BB too.