RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:JP Morgan analyst cuts target for SU from C$35 to C$34I'll bet you anything that you'll never have to get rid of your gas unless you personally have a vendetta against it. If no one can afford the gas, then certainly no one will afford geothermal. You think all these coop homes are gonna be retrofitted with geothermal? XD that would be quite something
Tommy123 wrote: The question is, will there be a case for oil and gas once the carbon tax is $170 a tonne in a few years (assuming Trudeau wins). I know I'll be buying an EV, getting rid of my natural gas furnace, and not flying anymore.
Co2Harvest wrote: Some may find this article interesting. Lyn offers her thoughts on why Geothermal hasn't achieved widespread usage but that's just a small portion of a comprehensive look at the broader energy industry and how there still may be a strong case for oil and gas: https://www.lynalden.com/oil-and-gas/
Tommy123 wrote: No, natural gas still emits carbon. No one will be using natural gas when the carbon tax is $170+ a tonne, unless they hate money. I'm personally looking to alternative options to heat my home, including geothermal.
firstworld wrote: The transition to green energy is ten times more carbon intensive than sticking to fossil fuels as Germany has proven having transitioned 30 years ago losing nearly a TN in the process. Anglos so far behind leading nations it's comical just look at ON where $200 BN lost in the FIT. Stupid Canadians....just use the natural gas idiots
Tommy123 wrote: Marner16 wrote: EOM
That's far too optimistic a price target. With oil declining, I want to see them transition to green energy before I buy.