RE:RE:RE:RE:I thinkBio... I'm not going to pretend that I know more about this company (or the industry for that matter) than you do. Neither am I trying to convince or influence anyone. Just sharing information.
that said, I will allow myself to use "investing's most expensive words"... this time is different. The difference with past years are:
- SVA only company with viable, repeatable clinical results
- January results did get big pharma's attention... negotiating from there does take a bit of time
- $30M enables SVA to do things there were not able to before (hiring the right firms business side and the right contractors clinical side)
the proof will be in the upcoming NRs pudding.