RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Very difficult to be constructiveI am personally not ready to move in that direction yet. But I am open to any ideas anyone might have. We probably have enough shareholders to cause a fuss if we wanted to but I am not sure we have enough to vote anyone off the board. Even had I voted my shares against board members last year, they would not have lost their seats. There is at least one other key shareholder who would need to join and, since SP controls fewer shares this year, you might need even more to effect any real change. Obviously, the timing is hard too as we should be hearing about the phase 1a results right around the time of the AGM. If there are good results, it will likely be hard to muster enough "no" votes to make any changes. If the results are bad, it may be too late to take any action. So, I am not seeing an easy path to make changes but messages can still be sent with your vote. They may not be received, but they can be sent.
Scioto1 wrote:
Wino, SPCEO, others, what are your assessments? Do we have like minds to craft a simple and measurable agenda? How do we use the meeting and board elections to advance a stockholder value agenda?