RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Oh the dramametalhead666 wrote: Investing/speculating is not, never has been and never will be a "science" and I never said or implied that I take any scientific stance with my investments. There is randomness which cannot be modeled. There is human behavior which cannot be predicted. There's manipulation and machine trading which neither you or I can fathom....that being said....given all the subjective parameters involved I DO stack the odds in my favor by employing EMPIRICAL evidence (the demograhic thesis I illustrated several times) I do not claim that that alone can allow for detailed predictions but it's better than darts.
You on the other hand CLAIM without any evidence either of the empirical kind or logical kind that one number can beget another irrespective of everything else in reality. You claim that numbers and lines on a graph can influence real world prices while I maintain justifiably that REALITY puts those numbers on your charts not the other way around.
QUIZ....do moving averages determine price or does price determine moving averages? You know..the made up 50 100 200 day moving averages vs the 28 149 and 63 day moving averages? Which determines which?
Play the odds and spread the risk. TKO looks like a good risk at this price.