Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

True North Commercial REIT T.TNT.UN

Alternate Symbol(s):  TUERF

True North Commercial Real Estate Investment Trust (the REIT) is a Canada-based unincorporated, open-ended real estate investment trust. The REIT’s primary objective is to maximize total returns to its unitholders. Its returns include a stable, reliable, and tax-efficient monthly cash distribution as well as long-term appreciation in the value of its units through the effective management of a portfolio of commercial properties. The REIT is focused on creating value for unitholders through the investment in and ownership of commercial properties in Canada. The REIT owns and operates a portfolio of approximately 44 properties consisting of approximately 4.8 million square feet in urban and select strategic secondary markets across Canada. Its properties include 9200 Glenlyon Parkway; 36 and 38 Solutions Drive; 1595 16th Avenue; 855 8th Avenue SW; 5775 Yonge Street; 6 Staples Avenue; 845 Prospect Street, and 551 King Street.


TSX:TNT.UN - Post by User

Comment by flamingogoldon Feb 13, 2024 8:29am
140 Views
Post# 35877108

RE:WOW

RE:WOW

You are looking for promises in the wrong area. The commercial real estate sector has been gutted. The "best" we can expect in the near future (months to years) is a distribution re-instatement (at some level) and the path forward to achieving this is the strategy being implemented. But... no guarantees.

You have a right to disagree with the strategy. and while your previous post was incorrect, I'm surprised it was still removed as worse things have been said on other boards I've been on.


giovinco wrote: My post got removed for defamation according to stockhouse. I am out of here, how can posting truthful facts be defamation without being proven not to be true?

When they were paying me dividend, I was buying shares with all the dividend anyway so them stopping dividend and buying back shares is a transfer of wealth from shareholder to the company.
I don't think that is a good strategy after all for the shareholders, unless we can be promised a higher dividend payout at the end of the buyback to make up for the lost dividend payment missed in between.
I just hope that is what happens in April. They can't come back saying that they are reinstating the same dividend payment or even lower due to higher interest expense.
That's all. If they reinstate a lower dividend, then how is that increasing shareholder value? They may be just trying to hide the fact that they no longer can pay the dividend even at the current rate, which they said was safe not long ago after the cut happened.
The company must have hired someone to look over these boards which are truly waste of shareholders valuable money.
I was not against Daniel Drimmer but he clearly does not know how to make relationships work.

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>