Ragingbull I would never vote for corporate raiders. I, as a shareholder, would also do everything possible to avoid corporate raiders to sit on the Board of Directors - I would vote against them. I do not want corporate raiders to represent my interests as a Real shareholder. Is that clear or still not quite?
You apparently consider the term "corporate raider" as a positive one which company's investors would like and support, not as a harmful one...... Also your support of High Tea is quite remarkable I would say. Hmmm.....
If I may, please let me to educate you a bit: Term "corporate raider" is clearly negative and diminishing one. It degrades the person and put one in unfavorable and disadvantageous position. Being a corporate raider isn't something to be proud of. It's not a good position to be in.
But Raging Bull, may be you are just trying to say that any words posted here are irrelevant? Most likely it's the case but........... why you do not apply exactly the same logic to other bizarre and false acquisations made by High Tea himself?
Doesn't make any sense buddy, very strange in fact to say the least. Sorry.
P.S. Nice try anyway.