Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Ursa Major Minerals Incorporated T.UMJ

TSX:UMJ - Post Discussion

Ursa Major Minerals Incorporated > Latest in the bun fight
View:
Post by purple43 on Jan 27, 2011 9:22am

Latest in the bun fight

Jan 27, 2011 08:08 ET

Inspiration Mining Responds to Proposed Private Placement by Ursa Major

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - Jan. 27, 2011) - Inspiration Mining Corporation ("Inspiration" or the "Corporation") (TSX:ISM)(FRANKFURT:OI8) responded today to the January 26 press release issued by Ursa Major Minerals Incorporated ("Ursa") announcing a proposed private placement of $2,580,000. Based on publicly available information, Ursa has 66,007,534 issued shares and the proposed private placement if completed would result in the issue of 13,500,000 shares and 3,945,000 warrants and broker warrants. 

Inspiration owns 13,000,000 shares or 19.7% of Ursa's current issued and outstanding shares and requisitioned a meeting of shareholders of Ursa on November 1, 2010 to elect a new slate of directors. Pursuant to Inspiration's requisition, Ursa has called a meeting of shareholders for March 3 with a record date for voting of February 1. 

Ursa has been very secretive about the Inspiration requisition by not issuing any press release stating that Inspiration requisitioned the meeting or that it is for the purpose of removing the current directors of Ursa. Indeed the first time Ursa mentions the need for a shareholders meeting is nearly three months after receiving the requisition and at the bottom of its January 26 press release announcing the proposed private placement by stating:

  "In response to a request for a shareholder meeting, URSA Major has scheduled a special meeting of shareholders for March 3, 2010".

What URSA has failed to state is that the request is in fact a requisition by Inspiration, its largest shareholder, to remove the Ursa directors and elect a new slate of Ursa directors. There is no public disclosure anywhere by Ursa that its largest shareholder is seeking to remove the current Ursa directors. 

It is plainly obvious that the proposed private placement is designed by management and the directors of Ursa to entrench themselves by securing friendly votes from the private placement investors in the upcoming shareholders meeting. Inspiration believes that closing an Ursa private placement on or before the February 1 record date would be a breach of the fiduciary obligation of management and the directors and would represent oppressive conduct towards all Ursa shareholders including Inspiration. 

In particular, the proposed issuance of 13,500,000 shares and 3,945,000 warrants and broker warrants has been designed to nullify the share voting power of Inspiration which owns 13,000,000 Ursa shares. If the private placement is completed, there would be a material effect on control of Ursa because the new investors would own 17% of the issued Ursa shares and the 19.7% ownership position of Inspiration would drop to 16.4% or lower. 

The proposed issuance of 13,500,000 shares and 3,000,000 warrants represents in the aggregate 25% of the currently issued shares, which is the maximum number of shares that may be issued without shareholder approval under the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange. 

Randy Miller, the Chief Executive Officer of Inspiration, stated: "The proposed private placement is unquestionably tied to maintaining control of Ursa by placing the maximum shares possible in the hands of friendly investors right before the record date for the Ursa shareholders meeting called to remove the Ursa directors."

Inspiration intends to take all appropriate action against Ursa, its management and directors for their oppressive conduct in connection with the proposed private placement. 

Comment by KerBer on Jan 27, 2011 10:22am
So I guess the question now is, was the PP done to protect existing management and the BOD or is there a legitimate need for funds at this point.Will ISM, which at this point has invested a lot of money in UMJ, continue to try and accumulate shares. Or will they go through the courts, which will involve spending money and time, to try an resolve the issue. Strange that they would issue a NR ...more  
Comment by tickle1st on Jan 27, 2011 11:28am
A case of RS looking after his own interests.He has brought huge dilution to existing shareholders so he can hang onto that paycheck.You have to love the guy for looking out after #1....and I don't think shareholders are in the #1 category.I think he is the best CEO that any junior mining company can have. As i said in the past, he knows how to operate a public company.Good luck to all you ...more  
Comment by throughmud on Jan 27, 2011 11:48am
KerBer, the way I see it is that ISM has been attempting to take over a perfectly viable mining company (UMJ), that has proven, competent management, without having to do the hard work of mine discovery, development, etc. This is not a situation I support. I am completely happy with RS's solid management and success in bringing Shakespeare to production and protecting the investment during the ...more  
Comment by tickle1st on Jan 27, 2011 1:55pm
Through muckWhy am I not surprised to see you happy as a pig is Shat to see you 17 cent stock eroded even farther by huge dilution so RS can keep his job?You guys kill me.If RS was doing such a great job, the share price would NOT BE UNDERVALUED to give 2 bit junior mining companies an opportunity to buy another 2 bit junior mining company and the cost to finance drilling would not be so dilutive ...more  
Comment by Magnum on Jan 27, 2011 2:17pm
I also pulled the pin following this financing announcement....only a small position,but I will observe trading for a while.GLTA,Magnum
Comment by tickle1st on Jan 27, 2011 4:30pm
MagnumThe truth of the matter is for the past year all these guys have been talking about is how UNDERVALUED the stock is...as if that was some sort of rocket to the top.Well, I'd sooner be talking about how OVERVALUED the stock is.Most of these guys are happy to look at an empty glass hoping it gets filled...which is not going to happen.And now, the dilution has made that glass so much bigger ...more  
Comment by victor2009 on Jan 27, 2011 4:40pm
I'll throw out a few comments on the private placement and today's Press Release from ISM. First of all, I'll repeat - I'm biased when it comes to ISM. Randy Miller is the epitome of the type of Officer and Director I don't want to see involved in any company. I have no idea what ISM's strategy might be, but as long as there is any way that ISM, Miller, or their friends ...more  
Comment by KerBer on Jan 30, 2011 1:40pm
Victor2009,Just a few comments on your comments.You are correct that due notice was given regarding a special meeting and I find it amazing that RM could complain in a public news release that the meeting was somehow "secret". It is one reason why I find ISM's news release childish. Also, the fact that he never called a special meeting, although he had, as you ...more  
Comment by joogets on Jan 30, 2011 4:21pm
i did the same thing.  i only had 43k shares but the point is....they were doing okay and all of the sudden...kerplunk.i will watch it and maybe pick up some cheapies again....doing this kinda just gave me a sour taste...will keep it on my level2  there is some stock to tidy up now...so...cheers...
Comment by victor2009 on Jan 31, 2011 1:05am
KerBer,Your comment that the placement would constitute normal operations is well taken. I was speaking more from the standpoint of a legal argument, should it come to that. I think management could make a strong argument for saying they felt it was an opportune time to look after some equity funding, and come up with some rationale for doing so, that would support the move as being in the course ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities