Post by
beastcoastOG on Nov 02, 2022 9:01am
IPVM What do do I think ?
Well.. I think this sums up IPVM
"This means Evolv Express would not detect plastic explosives, 3D-printed guns, and many types of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) such as lead pipe bombs. Additionally, though uncommon, non-ferrous guns and knives do exist and would not be detected".
Well , No Sh%t !
Both Evolv and Patriot are Magenetic resonance devices. Only Millimeter wave can detect shapes and non metallic. Neither PATSCAN or Evolv Express are Millimeter wave. Evolv Edge is Millimeter Wave , but too expensive to mass deploy.
Also remember that Patriot one had test 1.2 then test 1.4. ? Go look th the JP video !
Test 1.2 was abismal and test 1.4 better. This wasn't actually software improvements it was environmental noise clutter. Test 1.4 was conducted in a Hotel side room where as 1.2 was in an arena. Pat had two knives tested and still got rather Iffy results evolve had a multitude tested and was not brilliant either.
The IPVM turkey shoot isnt based on what evolv has been saying. It is based on what it isn't saying.
Now ive looked at several videos with Peter George in . Including one done after the Ulvade shooting , nowhere at all can I find a statement written or on film where he states that. Nowhere can I find anything where he states "All weapons"
Put both reports side by side on scores not statements. The scores didnt move.
So what I think is this. If and I say "IF" any person from Evolv has said that the product can do something that it cant , thats a firing offence in my book regardless of who you are , even and especially the CEO. No different in respect I said about the early PAT management team , pure B schitters.
As for IPVM looks like they are putting statements together that are a twist on words. I note that IPVM cut out the other 2/3 of the BCC report, WHY ?
Comment by
Golden100 on Nov 02, 2022 9:11am
I guess that must mean that evolve must consider notebooks to be nonferrous. You're funny.