Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Twin Butte Energy Ltd TBTEF

Twin Butte Energy Ltd is an oil and natural gas exploration, development and production company with properties located in Western Canada. The firm's operational assets have been sold to West Lake Energy Corp.


GREY:TBTEF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by PetroExploreron Nov 04, 2016 9:33am
140 Views
Post# 25423971

RE:3rd Quarter earnings report due soon?

RE:3rd Quarter earnings report due soon?Bob, my guess is no: we won't see any 3Q financials, in the near future.  But let's see what happens.

LTS filed under CCAA, whereas TBE was under the BIA.  The LTS board (rightly or wrongly), is still trying to salvage the company, and keep their jobs.  The TBE board just threw the keys to the bank, and doesn't want anything to do with the company, it would appear.  (They may still be preparing a stink bid as part of a new company, to try and grab the assets.)

Since TBE is in full receivership, and the board has resigned, there is no obligation to publicly file financials.  Interested parties will be talking to the receiver, to determine how things are looking.

Ironically, TBE is probably in better shape than LTS.  I suspect they'll have positive cashflow, whereas LTS had negative cashflow.  LTS is a complete basket case, yet the secured creditor was still willing to put in a credit bid.  But for the sake of the unsecured creditors, they are the ones that also need to put in a credit bid, but that might cost a bit more, to guarantee the debt of the secured creditors, so that may not happen. 

I think the TBE debenture holders are in a better position, than the LTS unsecured creditors.  I'll do some analysis on that, in the future.
Bullboard Posts