Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Twin Butte Energy Ltd TBTEF

Twin Butte Energy Ltd is an oil and natural gas exploration, development and production company with properties located in Western Canada. The firm's operational assets have been sold to West Lake Energy Corp.


GREY:TBTEF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by PetroExploreron Jan 17, 2017 12:18am
143 Views
Post# 25715890

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Remember - Common Shares vs Debenture

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Remember - Common Shares vs Debenture
BASTILLEDAY4U wrote:
PetroExplorer wrote: Here's my take on this topic: the only way to get more (than zero) value for the shares, is to get the company into CCAA, and continue the process, as the Ad Hoc group had requested.


I finally see your point which makes a lot of sense. However, we didn't have an old farmer wanting to save the farm, we had something else. Is it possible for the Ad Hock group, to be given the job of managing this mess under CCAA if they do indeed have a plan and possible financial backing to pay off the banks?


I speculate that FTI Consulting could be appointed a Monitor in CCAA, then some sort of Twin Butte board would have to be constituted.  No reason that certain Ad Hoc members, couldn't participate in a new Twin Butte board, as they have done a good job in the absence of the old board.  They just couldn't vote on any matters related to a plan of arrangement solution, on the Debentures.

This would all first require the judge to give a break on the receivership.
Bullboard Posts