RE:RE:RE:Geophysical anomaliesRetiredgeo, I'm thinking anything 0.5-0.6% or higher over long widths 400-500m and longer should be good for holes 1 to 3.
According to Goldfinger/Robert who was onsite 2 weeks ago:
"
Transition from high chargeability to moderate chargeability seems to be the most promising areas - testing the footprint of the corridor with big step-outs."
Well, unless i am wrong, holes 1 to 3 appear to be in that transition zone as per deep IP and the shallow IP from earlier (higher resolution as probes were spaced closer together). Interestingly, Hole 5 from last year appears to be more in the High chargeability pyrite zone as par shallow IP.