RE:RE:Articleit's a very interesting decision and there is lots that needs to be unpacked to understand what it really means for future development in that specific area of the northeast, let alone what it might mean for resource development in other areas of the province. It really is apples and oranges compared to the booker situation. Firstly it involves the ability to continue to practice specified treaty rights (to hunt, trap, fish) which is different from aboriginal claims of right or title that may exist in non-treaty areas. Secondly, the extent, magnitude, and the types of disturbance within the two areas are very, very different. You really can't directly compare the two. One area has extensive linear corridor development of pipelines and seismic along with some forestry and agriculture impacts while the other has a couple of historic mines in the vicinity along with some forestry activity. The situations are not analagous and the decision is very specific to certain treaty lands that are hundreds of miles away from the proposed mine.