Pacific Booker Minerals Inc V.BKM

RE:RE:Environmental Minister

[zerubbabel]

Weavers MLA website has some amazing detail on Booker  in one of his recent blogs. Worth a read.  His most recent question in the house (a couple of days later) on Booker to Heyman is interesting now that I have actually read the script rather than just a political commentary on it.  Heyman's response is actually quite detailed but still disappointing.  Obviously he knew the question in advance.  I think there is a pretty strong relationship between Mr. Weaver, the Premier, the Speaker and I presume, the Environment Minister (even though they are not members of the same party).  For this issue to reach the floor of the legislature says a lot... And this is great for BKM.  But I don't know how to interpret the answers from the Mining Minister (in March) and now the Environment Minister.  Is it stonewalling and more of the same old delay tactics?   Is it a subtle message to the bureaucracy to deal with this matter?  I don't really get it.  Has the EAO really provided clarity in terms of their expectations for BKM to fill in the final details of their report?  What a weird scenario...

[scatterhead]

How about this; Environment Ministry said..... "The company, of course, has to provide some very specific additional information that was required under the order. The order was specific. Some examples of the type of additional information required are sockeye salmon use of Morrison Lake, upper and lower Tahlo Creek and the Morrison River, hydrogeological and groundwater data for areas

[dano123]

I watched the exchange between Weaver and Heyman and honestly Heyman by saying he was proud of the new mining platform for quicker approval was pathetic. He was more interested in what he had done than listening to Weaver explain our dilemma. He was not receptive to making this wrong into a right. He probably doesn't know what's even happening at EAO and just my opinion but his vague