RE:RE:question for MBT123MBT123 is correct. He/she criticises me but we have the same view on this. I refuse to go ugly about it but it's true. We need accomplishment .before we can expect the share price to move. We've always needed that but we've never had it.
I'm not going to relitigate the performance of past CEOs, not today, at least. I've already made myself clear on that. I have also expressed the opinion that only with the money that the Chiesi and XOMA deals have brought to Bioasis can the company move forward to create the news we so badly need.
This is no time for shareholders to behave badly in such a public manner as we see here. I don't see even the smallest attempts to learn about what Bioasis's plans are, why Bioasis has chosen them or what they're all about. What I see is bad behaviour, on so many levels. But mostly I see weakness, an inability to think clearly when times are difficult.
But in the end, I'm an advocate for the same things that MBT123, beenthere, Aarcor, gfF and others want - resolution, accomplishment, news and a sense of partnership with shareholders who have backed this since 2007 - 14years!
But I will not behave as these people do. I will never so perfectly illustrate weakness as they do. I would never pusposefully try to undercut the efforts of those trying to move this forward, certainly now when for a few months we've had the resources to move forward.
Some people have made this into a hate story where all efforts to improve things are met with the daily expression of that hate. I have news for these. In the end, other than scaring new investment away, which has hurt Bioasis and its shareholders, they will have no effect on the outcome. Bioasis has finally made choices that it can fund and can advance to fruition. Life before June 29, 2020 doesn't exist.
jd