Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Bowood Energy Inc V.BWD

TSXV:BWD - Post Discussion

Bowood Energy Inc > Farm in
View:
Post by CravenRaven101 on Feb 27, 2012 3:53pm

Farm in

without any idea of what the actual farm in between LEG & BWD looks like, I would imagine it's a rolling option agreement so that as much land can be held by production as possible, let us also NOT loose sight of the fact that a good piece is on Blood land (First nations)... meaning that the mineral agreements probably contain some rather short timelines to prove up production before the likes of BWD & LEG loose the leases...

The importance of Mineral tenure is often overlooked by folks trying to foresee a company's fortunes in the WCSB... what a company does NOT hold by production returns to the crown (in BWD/ LEG's case it would be the Blod first nations) so that someone else has a chance to try their luck. SO... this "alternative measure" MIGHT just be BWD's effort to go 100% on lands NOT associated with the LEG transaction... as I wrote earlier... the seismic has probably been shot and interpreted by now... and THIS could be an effort by BWD managment to fast track development, cash out... OR both... either way... I see the fore sale sign as a very positive move...NOT an act of desperation...

All the market has to do now is shake loose the rest of the shorts so that a  "real" 30 day..60  day...90 day average can be zeroed in on for a solid valuation.

 

as always just my opinion do your DD and git yer own.

Comment by chizled on Feb 27, 2012 4:26pm
This is the details of the lease on Blood Indians land The Lease will have a 5 year term and is subject to mineral royalties substantially similar to AlbertaCrown royalties. In addition, Bowood will commit to:a total up front consideration of $14,128,000  pay annual rent of $5.00/hectare, amounting to approximately $122,000 per year  drill one well to a minimum depth of 1,000 metres in ...more  
Comment by chizled on Feb 27, 2012 4:26pm
This is the details of the lease on Blood Indians land The Lease will have a 5 year term and is subject to mineral royalties substantially similar to AlbertaCrown royalties. In addition, Bowood will commit to:a total up front consideration of $14,128,000  pay annual rent of $5.00/hectare, amounting to approximately $122,000 per year  drill one well to a minimum depth of 1,000 metres in ...more  
Comment by sureshotz on Feb 27, 2012 5:03pm
Bing bing bing
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities