Trading Haltafter going through SEDAR's documents (Dozens of them back to 2005) I see that CMC classified the historical resources as inferred.
In other words they (CMC) insisted the historical "proved and probable resources" were to be treated as INFERRED since the historical data(1980's) was not NI43-101 compliant.
.
This was reported in many documents (from 2005) which were accepted by BC Securities Commission.
Whatever was said on the website might have been different. Don't know
Anyway Failure to File is a typical Bureacratic way to increase fees and revenue and usually lasts a few days. The stock then trades at where it was before. (like v.AAG ceased trade Aug 14th and was relisted 4 days later. Failure to file again)
My question would be:- since when does the BCSC compare webpages to documents from 2005 ?. hmmm.......
(not to mention how it took 6 months to issue the order).
My feeling is that if BCSC responded to a complaint then the person that made the complaint is attempting to cause CMC problems or drive the stock price down.(but also they must be carefully watching the company's documents to do that). Obviously not a shareholder!
hmmmm..........