Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Canada Nickel Company Inc V.CNC

Alternate Symbol(s):  CNIKF

Canada Nickel Company Inc. is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in advancing the nickel-sulfide projects to deliver nickel required to feed the electric vehicle and stainless-steel markets. The Company owns flagship Crawford Nickel-Cobalt Sulphide Project in the heart of the prolific Timmins-Cochrane mining camp. The Company also owns 25 additional nickel targets located near the Crawford Project. Its wholly owned NetZero Metals Inc. to develop zero-carbon production of Nickel, Cobalt and Iron and applied for the trademarks NetZero Nickel NetZero Cobalt and NetZero Iron across several jurisdictions.


TSXV:CNC - Post by User

Comment by DrNo1962on Nov 24, 2021 2:05pm
103 Views
Post# 34162413

RE:RE:RE:More Insider Buying by Mark Selby

RE:RE:RE:More Insider Buying by Mark Selby I'm no lawyer but I wonder to what degree the previous 2-3 quallitative news releases describing assay results qualify as disclosure?  Don't know the answer but is it possible these releases pass the legal test for disclosure and unelss they uncover something materially different than they have described they are under no obligation to release quantitative results until they are ready?  No idea answer to this question.  I say this b/c these releases were unusual IMO and I don't think they would have been aware of the magnitude of the lab delays when they intentionally released these qualitative releases *many* months ago. Was this done so they can sit on results as received?  Just a thought.



Rm90090 wrote: Does Mark buying today mean we won't get assays released anytime soon? 


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>