Critical Elements Lithium Corp V.CRE

Environmental Assessment (Updated on June 10, 2021)

[Hovis]

It seems that there is some new information to consider.
Water issues are usually a complicated subject.

https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/documents/p80005/138926E.pdf

Regard 
Hovis

[Jordsword]

I am having trouble with this web address. Can anyone help give some details, clarity? thanks

[Hovis]

https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/evaluations/proj/80148/contributions/id/54598

[Hovis]

  June 10, 2021 Impact Assessment Agency of Canada / Government of Canada Quebec Regional Office To the attention of : Ms Vronique Lalande Project Manager By email: [e-mail] Subject: Transport Canada Final Expert Advice - Canadian Navigable Waters Act - Rose Lithium- Tantalum Project - Northern Quebec, Province of Quebec Madam, This advice replaces the

[Jordsword]

Thank you Hovis. The last paragraph seems to be contradictory to the rest of the message. Is this just a simple matter of applying for exemptions for those water courses? Maybe someone on here knows these inner workings of our incredibly efficient government systems. No wonder China has a stranglehold on the supply chain...

[Speedypete]

No action required is my understanding of the read.

[Speedypete]

I read they are simply relacating the fishing camp reo1 and all is adequately satisfied    Thats how i read it?

[Speedypete]

Rinny1   Your thoughts?

[Speedypete]

Im sure tats what that means       Woohhoo   Theres the assesment   Another step closer!!!

[Rinny1]

Looking like no further action required to me !! nobody can step in and stop the assessment, they had there're chance. next permit completed :)

[Speedypete]

Loving every minute of it!!  Thanks for formation Rinny1

[Speedypete]

Sorry for my poor spelling    Thanks for confirmation i meant to say.  I have been in hospital for two weeks staring at this phone and eyes need a rest   Gltal  go cre go!!!

[electriqueman]

NO stress at all for the Rose project! Look the last sentence: In view of the elements stated above, Transport Canada deems the measures proposed by the proponent and the potential conditions of the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada to be adequate and has no additional mitigation measures to propose. All good for me

[Speedypete]

I am with you on that  

[Speedypete]

Electricqueman

[Rinny1]

Tons of water !! closed loop water system no problem (effluent like closed loop)  Recycle technology have come a long way!!! I work in this type of environment

[tinker901]

I read it a couple times and at the end it looks like Critical has to ask for an exemption from the CNWA for 28 out of 40 waterways on the Rose property, even if they are used only occasionnally. The document is saying that other then that the study is good to go. We need to talk to JSL. I am far from being sure that i am "decoding" this buraucratic language correctly since the last

[110158]

The important think is how the market will react on this statement. This came out on thursday and nothing look's like it at an impact on friday trades. Maybe it will have none at all. Maybe when more people will know they will take this on the negative side. Never easy for CRE.....when you see other who can go fordward without taking care of BAPE What else after that ? Go CRE Go

[dalesio_98]

I am in agreement with your assessment. We'll see what the exemption entails.

[blowshigh]

Hi Folks, This update is basically the same document that was published back on April 14th, the only change as stated in the opening paragraph "There was an error in the number of watercourses that would require exemption." So the listing of watercourses has changed slightly in this updated version of the document that is all.  The exemptions issue has been known since originally

[LivingDLife]

I'm thinking the same tinker, regarding the exemption. Seems to tend towards a need for an exemption. While the last paragraph, seems very positive overall. If one of the longs, can talk with JSL and confirm? I think we'd all appreciate the clarification. Go CRE Go

[110158]

in the market the problem often is not what it is...... the problem is how it is perceived That is the question like............. to be or not to be  Markets are emotional not realistic

[Rinny1]

Hopefully CRE will speak and clear it up,, I'll text Eric on his thoughts.. maybe he will tweet or NR release 

[Speedypete]

I see whatvyou mean    

[Speedypete]