RE:RE:RE:RE:What news means. Viewed in isolation @bugeyes is right: I broke my promise. But you know very well that Doc and Co. has repeatedly made allusions to my contributions - at Stockhouse and at CEO.CA.
To interpret my silence resp. my not writing as weakness would be a mistake. If fundamental legal facts are twisted, I will write also in the future - is practically an emergency aid. Exactly in such a way I will hold it also in the future.
But of course I would also be able to make an analysis concerning the calculation bases. Currently only so much: 7.5% of the insitu value without reserves, without feasibility studies and without permit (especially environmental permit) and Aznalcollar per dato open is at least very sportive. For 7.5% the project would have to be at least shovel ready.
urai58
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)