Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Frontier Lithium Inc V.FL

Alternate Symbol(s):  LITOF

"Frontier Lithium Inc is a Canada-based mining exploration company engaged in acquisition, exploration, and development of mining properties. It focuses on elements like lithium, tantalum, rubidium, and cesium by exploring for lithium, cesium and tantalum classified pegmatites. Geographically it operates in one segment, Canada. Its main project is the PAK lithium project."


TSXV:FL - Post by User

Comment by DoggerJTon Mar 01, 2023 5:10pm
142 Views
Post# 35313606

RE:RE:Upcoming PEA!

RE:RE:Upcoming PEA!Now I'm curious... are the calculations for PEA, PFS, and DFS different?

I'm wondering because I can't see anyone using $13,500 USD per tonne for LiOH given the market trend... I had kind of expected a double on that piece but would like to hear why that wouldn't be considered. How about $20,000 USD per tonne, meaning an increase of only 48%

Add to that the fact that the tonnage used for the 2021 PEA was around 24 tonnes, while we're now considering about 58 tonnes, an increase of 140% or so.

Given those two things, I expected the PFS to work out to around 3.46 billion USD... 974mm * 1.48 * 2.40.

I understand that we're looking at a staged approach that may introduce additional costs but I suspect they're not doing that in order to reduce the NPV. Not a lot of sense in that.

I am open to comments on the math... the more the merrier.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>