Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

GRAND POWER LOGISTICS GROUP INC. V.GPW

"Grand Power Logistics Group Inc through its subsidiary provides air-freight forwarding and sea-freight services, customs brokerage, logistics, warehousing and distribution, as well as other value added services."


TSXV:GPW - Post by User

Comment by C32BTTon Nov 04, 2016 5:09pm
154 Views
Post# 25426440

RE:Shareholders will vote for or against this 0.09$ nonsense?

RE:Shareholders will vote for or against this 0.09$ nonsense?Buyers owns around 22%.  

Management have been buying a lot of shares back at $0.04-0.055 range before they annouced privatization.  It's obvious to me the buyers know they're buying back a lot of the company for cheap from the weak hands.  If you look at the bookvalue alone that's around $0.15 a share with most of the value coming from liquid assets and commercial real estate.  There's no goodwill or any intangible assets on their books, so the value of the company should be fairly close to that.  I'm thinking the offer price should be closer to that value as well than their current offer price of $0.09 a share.  

If you read the news announcement in it a third party valuator mentions that the offer price they gave was not fair, so I'm thinking it definitely should be more than $0.09 a share.

Here:

"The Special Committee retained Evans & Evans, Inc. as an independent valuator, who prepared a Comprehensive Valuation Report and Fairness Opinion dated October 12, 2016 (the "Report") with respect to the proposed Amalgamation. The Report concluded that the Offer Price was not fair from a financial point of view."
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>