Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Gensource Potash Corp V.GSP

Alternate Symbol(s):  AGCCF

Gensource Potash Corporation is a Canada-based fertilizer development company. The Company is focused on developing resource opportunities with a specific focus on potash development. The Company operates under a business plan that has two key components: vertical integration with the market to ensure that all production capacity built is directed, and pre-sold, to a specific market, eliminating market-side risk; and technical innovation, which allows for a modular and economic potash production facility, which demonstrates environmental leadership within the industry, producing no salt tailings, therefore eliminating decommissioning. Its projects include Tugaske Project, Vanguard Area and Lazlo Area. The Vanguard Area is 100% owned in central Saskatchewan, located 170 kilometers (km) South of Saskatoon, 150 km North-West of Regina on a provincial highway system. The Lazlo Area is located in central Saskatchewan.


TSXV:GSP - Post by User

Comment by mdjbrownon Oct 30, 2023 4:40pm
185 Views
Post# 35708075

RE:RE:RE:The Juniors

RE:RE:RE:The Juniorssw248 as Gensource reported previously, Helm pulled their $50 million equity portion, if I recall shortly after the KfW IPEX Bank and Societe Generale $280 million debt financing terminated.

Not that unusual as equity financing generally tends to be associated with debt financing to some degree in any big project.    

Strictly my guess sw248, but with rumored issues at the two mines that did give this horizontal mining technique a shot, I could see an investor agree to front the cost of building an operating proof of concept cavern to prove GSPs tech, but I find it really hard to fathom hundreds of millions of dollars will be invested anywhere in this novel sector, until the process can be shown to work with absolutely no hiccups.

As mentioned in an earlier post, I believe that an initial simple single downhole cavern could be completed for a couple million dollars.  Gensources design may be significantly higher if they still intend on relying on the previously reported Moab model due to all the drilling involved.

I think by now most folks realize that although vaguely similiar, the Moab mines are not a great example of the type of mines the juniors in Saskatchewan are trying to build, unless of course it incorporates the use of a flooded, abandoned conventional mine, which there arent many of those in the province. 

As oldsalt72 mentioned in a previous post, Mosaic's flooded Esterhazy mine could possibly be used, but I am not sure Moab's current production model supports the volume the juniors in Saskatchewan were previously promoting.   




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>