HPQ Silicon Inc V.HPQ

Samples

[dstots]

Bernard needs to get a sample out the door because the market is getting a bit restless. That would be a good catalyst to move the price up. In the absence of that we will continue to drift. It may be timed for PYR to uplist to NASDAQ at the same time. Hopefully soon.

[Breizh1]

Bernard is on the same wave length as PPP. Do it right or not at all. He might take some time. Shipping of samples is imminent!. Definition of imminent: less than 12 months. GLTA.

[teheran10]

Losing money is NEVER HEALTHY, otherwise you would give me a bunch of shares. Let us face the reality and not bs back and forth. As he said here above, we need those samples out the door so we can sign contracts. PERIOD. I know many of you have done great DD and support the community here, thank you for that, but we need results from the company. I must admit I have sold a bunch of stock at 1.5

[paul0316]

I'll admit Peter and Bernard have a habit of setting timelines that aren't usually met in time. Some of it may be out of their control but one thing that keeps us in this play is they usually accomplish what they tell us they are working on or towards. It's hard on the patience at times because of the timelines they set, but their goals are usually met in due time.  

[Koooo]

Well they overachieved on their first samples. Would you rather them send the wrong ones or get the right ones and do it right the first time. I think it'll be before the week's out but if it's next week that's okay too.

[paul0316]

I get they overachieved. My point is they shouldn't give specific timelines on things they don't control. Nobody knew what specifications would be churned out on first attempts. So why tell everyone end of December-early January? There was a lot of hype about shipment leading into the new year. Anyways like I said I know they always deliver in the end, I've been here long enough to

[Koooo]

Paul... I agree 100%..

[CancerSlayer]

  Possibly a lesson learned for both investors & mgmt...Sample delivery projections were based on computer simulation-based predictions, which we now know can be imperfect.  There are lots of variables at play for the NSiR (temperature levels, reactants, reactant ratios, human error, etc.) & it's probably best to not put a timeline on new science/technology, especially when

[teheran10]

I agree with you Paul 100% and I believe in both companies.

[Aarman4]

Please take your fooolish dribble elsewhere. Bernard's only job is to make sure he runs HPQ properly, and that he is doing. Your job is to buy when the share price is low, and hold as long as Bernard does his job. If you have "lost hundreds of thousands", then you bought kbnowing the long term future value of HPQ is going to dwarf whatever it was that you purchased it at. 

[teheran10]

No words

[itwillbeoknowok]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[Snowdogy]

I was thinking the C-word earlier but didn't want to actually write it out in public but since others have now used it I feel better (I think).