Labrador Gold Corp V.LAB

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Some of you may be shocked at this question

[AlwaysLong683]

megacopper wrote: If you had used that line of thinking with Diamond Fields and Robert Freidland (who was considered shady because of an environmental mess he left down in the states) you would have missed out on one of the best discoveries in the history of mining with Voiseys Bay. That being said what went on with Michael Collins at NFLD can't be ignored because the BOD allowed it to happen. So shame on them. 

mega, I agree that if a company makes a mistake in a hire, the responsible thing for the Board to do is end the relationships as quickly as possible, and investors can then re-evalutate the company based on how the Board handled the situation.

That said, was Robert Friedland relieved of all his duties at Diamond Fields when the suspect goings-on occurred so the could start again with a clean slate....?

Reason I ask is because Michael Collins remains a Director with NFLD according to ther website even though he stepped down as President and CEO, so the rest of the Board appears to be OK with him staying on the Board.

Also, as I mentioned in a previous post, Collins remains the President, CEO, as well as a Director at CRES, and NFLD announced a 50/50 partnership with CRES at the PB Hill Property in a PR dated June 3, only one day before NFLD's June 4 PR was issued stating that Collins has resigned as CEO and President of NFLD, so Collins seems to still be tied to NFLD in at least two ways.....?