Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Lifeist Wellness Inc V.LFST

Alternate Symbol(s):  LFSWF

Lifeist Wellness Inc. is a Canada-based health-tech company. The Company's portfolio of wellness companies leverages advancements in science and technology to enable consumers to find their individual path to wellness. Its portfolio business units include Mikra, which is a biosciences and consumer wellness company developing and selling products for cellular health and CannMart, which is a business-to-business (B2B) wholesale distribution business facilitating recreational cannabis sales to Canadian provincial government control boards.


TSXV:LFST - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by aurorahighon Dec 05, 2018 4:15pm
133 Views
Post# 29071513

RE:What the heck is going on with this stock

RE:What the heck is going on with this stockBetter question is wtf is going on with the latest downtrend in the mj sector.  Chalk it up to the growing pains of a new industry.  All normal and unsettling at the same time.
There is a lot of uncertainty in the market.  Mj sector keeps growing daily yet that is eclipsed by daily events.  Recent being the short attack on Apha.  Have a feeling this latest attempt put too much of a spot light on the companies who profit from 'scare tactics'. Illegally legal, for now.  
For N , I don't expect a plaintiff to come forward as it would be a weak case at best.  Prove N caused the losses and not the offensive article.  

Bullboard Posts