Post by
babymines on May 03, 2023 12:02pm
My Imagination
When a corporate officier controls the company they should be held accountable for the financial and governence decisions of a company. When a corporate officier controls 40% of the voting shares the chance of being voted off the board (ie removed from a salary postion) is nil. When all the knowlege that the shareholders have read from a company"s own News Releases do the shareholders still believe the corporate officier has the company's best interest or just wants to control the salary so they get paid no matter what. ask yourself are you better off paying millions to the corporate officer who makes mistake after mistake and has to be held accountable by a stock exchange and not by the shareholders.
Comment by
tennispro on May 03, 2023 12:16pm
Dykes is old. His days are numbered. Fact not lies
Comment by
babymines on May 03, 2023 8:40pm
why are there only people attacking desenting voices. why would they not demand accountability for the money this corporation was given and spent. nobody asked for accountability. calida and golden age mistakes just too examples. how much money did it cost stakeholders. 4 million and nobody held dykes responsible. the information is in the finacials look it up.
Comment by
tennispro on May 04, 2023 1:31pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy