RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Larisa SprottHum....If you had all the money and TIME in the world you would do mineable resource study
which after a couple of years would then lead you into a pre-feasability study whch would
give you a better understanding of the metalurgy and another 5 million to outside parties
and another 2 years wasted...then finally would do a feasability more like 3 years with
actually calling the mining engineer companies to contract equipment (sometimes even
building mine shafts). This is when you let banksters and the like call the shot on your
resource so they can extort more money from you as they have the loan outstanding.
This is entirely erronous in this case.
Fosterville was up and running 3 years as clearly defined small resource with very high
grade.It has been running now 6 years(?) with no 43-101 and they still do not have a
defined resource. I know a Columbian company that has never defined more than 2 years
of resource and running quite well. Regardless these epizonal orogenic structures are
very well defined and CONSISTANT.
Suregold1 look up the resource calculation for Fosterville ....they do not have one.
No, disagree, you will need a full mine feasibility study
As for this we have the blue print called Fosterville and please will you look at the board.
Doug Hurst started Fosterville to a mine and tell me why he sits on NFG board.
If you could give me the correct answer why he has sat on this board for nearly a year
and barely made a peep I would be grateful.
Spin me another of your conspiracies PLEASE Ike