RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Reverse Take Over News Was 11 Days Ago...Old News!Thank you Rich for the clarification and based thereon I offer up an apology to you for my allegation you were here to manipulate the stock for your own benefit. My mistake.
And thank you for providing the following...that is kinda what I was looking for.
"again i am providing snapshots of diverted trading (observation) that is done on the ats exchanges imo to stifle price appreciation, it is clear as day that they (here I presume you saw this with NXO) are manipulating the buys and sells to steer the price movement they desire."
But I did not post the question as a "deceitful trap"...I really did feel the need to challenge the statement...and I really was hoping for an answer that added more...
In the end though this was a good exercise. I think I understand you better and visa versa...and yes, I can be forceful and definite, BUT, I am also happy to be proven wrong and taught something, so am flexible.
rich39 wrote: Just a few clarifications on your last post and i quote " but that does not mean every company that trades here is sleazy. You have to provide more than an empty statement on a serious allegation like this....and it is serious." i never alleged that NXO as you say is sleazy, my venom is all exclusively against the tsx scam so called market, i never talked bad about NXO. again i am providing snapshots of diverted trading (observation) that is done on the ats exchanges imo to stifle price appreciation, it is clear as day that they are manipulating the buys and sells to steer the price movement they desire... retail investors like you and me should be highly concerned about but somehow you seem to think it’s more important to attack the messenger rather than the actual culprits, why is that?
and i quote "The dumb part is that it actually could have led to a fruitful, informative discussion where posters actually share information instead of clawing at each other." your question was a deceitful trap and was not trustworthy for a "fruitful" informative discussion, as you know i could not answer and as stated not the point.
By my past experience i have proof that different types (generalists and specialists)of people working together can be very fruitful, to put you in context we had a thriving service department with approximately 60 people working in it our core management service team was comprised of 3 people, 2 generalists types and 1 specialist, it was the best team that i worked in. the reasons that it worked so well it was diversity and respect without the respect it wouldn’t of worked. So ya i can work with you for Shure...