Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Sonoro Energy Ltd. V.SNV

Alternate Symbol(s):  SNVFF

Sonoro Energy Ltd. is a Canada-based oil and gas company. The Company is focused on oil and gas exploration and production in Canada and abroad, including the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region, southeast Asia, and southeast Europe. The Company holds a 70% working interest in a proven Waseca channel heavy oil resource fairway, which consists of 1,840-acre contiguous oil field located in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada. The Company’s subsidiary, Sonoro Energy Canada Ltd. (Sonoro Canada), conducts its operations in the Province of Saskatchewan.


TSXV:SNV - Post by User

Comment by SlyFox1on Oct 20, 2020 12:01pm
79 Views
Post# 31748308

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sonoro Annual Meeting

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sonoro Annual MeetingSpot on Copper, preference would fully go to a complete corporate buyout (ideally after a signed JOA, but not holding my breath on that one since we haven't been able to agree on it in over 1yr now). The only reason I stated the second as an option is if we cannot find someone to fully buy us out, and that they only want to buyout the underlying asset of Selat.

The only reason I bring up the second option as something even at all plausible again is given that MIGAS recently reinstated the cost recovery PSC model, which can make Budong an appealing opportunity again as their is an ability to have recovery of expenses under this PSC model. Under the PSC profit-sharing model, Budong/development blocks are significantly less appealing then under cost recovery PSC which was reinstated this summer. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>