RE:I hope investors are not confusing SWAN goals.Hello StockscoutX,
You make a point about Mason Resorces equities investors possibly associating the words graphene and graphite with the production of batteries for electric cars and suggest investors take a closer look at the applications employing either graphite or graphene.
Vey good suggestion StockscoutX.
Here, I'll take that bait.
Mason Resources doesn't mine graphite nor does the company produce or manufacture graphene or any product at al.
In fact, Mason Resources doesn't have a reason for being, i.e. other than to hold the equity holdings in SWAN.V and NOU.V and for Fahad Al Tamimi and crew to allow for their collective milking dry of what now remains in this TSX-V listed holding company (cynical eh?).
No business plan; and whatever plan does exist it's possible that a trained monkey could undertake successfully, lol!.
After all, selling equities stakeholds owned in both SWAN.V and NOU.V and doing so at a higher share price points doesn't take the skill set of a genius.
Mason Resources has about 40% of SWAN.V shares because of the deal made with Thomas Swan & Co owners and that other entity.
Look, you can wait all you like for something, which I have spoken to ad nauseam and with some specific detail, to shape up here.
There is no guaratntee that it would.
Never the less, I am waiting for Thomas Swan & Co to funnel into Black Swan Graphene all the intellectual property and trade secrets currently owed by Thomas Swan & Co and "friends", something which may or mat not happen and something which would have Black Swan Graphene become worth more than it is currently valued as being. I don't expect that is going to happen until after LLG.V merges with SWAN.V, etc.