RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Q3
The company's shareholders are almost entirely small shareholders, so we do have the power to force changes. Just look at the last AGM, we were half way to getting a new board. People were getting pretty disgruntled. And now we're 40% lower.
The problem is that we're not a Microsoft or an IBM. There's no elite pool of talent we can recruit from. We're a perennially under-achieving penny stock that's been in start up mode for 30 years. If we get rid of the board, we're only going to get more of the same: Directors just looking to earn some fees and expenses for little work. So I doubt a shake up will do anything other than make us feel better for a short amount of time.