Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company develops its 60% owned Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia. The Company's Treaty Creek property covers an area of approximately 17,918 hectares.


TSXV:TUD - Post by User

Comment by rockport1on Apr 19, 2024 11:27am
42 Views
Post# 35998095

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Should Tudor buy out AMK now?

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Should Tudor buy out AMK now?Perhaps the smart thing is for a third party miner to swallow up both AMK and TUO.  That they will have a carried 40% interest.  Let Tudor do all the heavy lifting until production time.

Larry60 wrote: Rockport,

agreed that it is unlikely to happen. it it didnt happen back when AMK traded at a massive discount, cant see it happening now.

WIth AMK now a pure TC play, dilution will be minimal e.g. $600k a year would be way more than enough which really doesnt even register on the dilution scale as much as I hate to see money go out the door.

What all this brings us back to is TUO/AMK is way better to hold than TUD.

rockport1 wrote: Reasonable analysis, essentially a 100% premium to market.  Which probably means it is too steep for Tudor.  I would guess that the max they would pay would be far below that.  Remember, that over that time period, AMK has had a 73% increase in shares outstanding, so there is still significant dilution taking place, even with the free carry.

Larry60 wrote: Rockport,

Pleas see my previous post.  I think .25 cents at current TUD share price of .92 is a starting point for discussions.  Ultimately, I dont think  most AMK SHs will be particularily interested in any deal as nothing beats a free carry.

rockport1 wrote: I guess that is a question for AMK shareholders.  For example, would you accept a 20% premium to market in an all stock deal?  You would still receive the benefits of 80% of the Treaty Creek development going forward.  The cost of the premium is no more free ride.   

Curious what AMK shareholders would find acceptable.  Please chime in.

fordster wrote: That is a great idea Rockport. It's either Tudor or someone else. The only problem is coming up with a valuation on this "moving target"










<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>