Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company develops its 60% owned Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia. The Company's Treaty Creek property covers an area of approximately 17,918 hectares.

TSXV:TUD - Post Discussion

Tudor Gold Corp > Lol…nice assult
View:
Post by fordster on Aug 21, 2023 5:36pm

Lol…nice assult

I'll stick to what actions have happened and who keeps investing...you two have demonstrated that you're both Seabridge plants...I have no doubts.

I believe Konkin..."Perfect Storm will become a mine." You know, that world class geologist that discovered VOK and Seabridges booty. He's been damned right on with you guys...not good enough now? ....higher grades and proving to be larger than any of your targets. Ridiculously hilarious.

Hey, why don't you two keep talking about those silly steep strip ratios! You guys kind of stop talking about that. Huh?

Get ready...we're nullifying your MTT through Treaty Creek!
Comment by cskhurasu on Aug 22, 2023 3:08pm
Hi fordster...you mention those 'silly steep strip ratios' in the Tudor Technical Report. I think they are more serious than silly.  The Technical Report breaks down open pit vs underground resources in table 14-1...550 million tonnes in the open pit and 325 million tonnes that would have to be mined underground. Table14-15 estimates the strip ratio for the open pit at 8.6/1.0. This ...more  
Comment by Larry60 on Aug 22, 2023 3:14pm
Fordster says dont worry about 9:1 strip ration.  Its just a mountain to be moved from on top.  And at 0.7g/t Au, why even worry? Besides, gonna blockcave it from 2.5kms underground.  Easy peasy.
Comment by fordster on Aug 22, 2023 3:26pm
It's known: the deeper the better for block cave...no open pit like you claim. There comes a point where I'm not going to dominate this board out of respect to the others. Rock on Big Boys...we all know your Seabridge anyways. Desperate situations bring out desperate acts. Such hard up actions based on misinformation....yeah we all know. Regurgitate your same exact points for the last few ...more  
Comment by Larry60 on Aug 22, 2023 3:46pm
Rudy pays well!!!! Thats the best youve got? Like I said, Fordster says dont worry.  Gonna blockcave it all.  Dont worry about metallurgy and economics.   There will be a mine! Hey, I think KK is great.  Would not be hear if I didnt.  But not only have I lost a ton the last couple of years on TUD, Ive also been dramaticlaly diluted with all the giveaway UNIT PPs ...more  
Comment by cskhurasu on Aug 22, 2023 4:17pm
fordster...the MOST ridiculous thing you have said on this site is that "the deeper the better for block cave". In a block cave, the deposit is mined from below but the ore has to come to surface to be processed. To get under the deposit to cave it, you need a ramp or shaft that gets you there. Every inch of ramp or shaft costs money to sink and money to use, especially bringing ore to ...more  
Comment by cskhurasu on Aug 22, 2023 4:20pm
fordster...the MOST ridiculous thing you have said on this site is that @the deeper the better for block cave@. In a block cave, the deposit is mined from below but the ore has to come to surface to be processed. To get under the deposit to cave it, you need a ramp or shaft that gets you there. Every inch of ramp or shaft costs money to sink and money to use, especially bringing ore to surface ...more  
Comment by fordster on Aug 22, 2023 6:40pm
Funny...I study what comes out of Tudor multiple of times...and I distinctly remember that the deeper the block cave the better...thanks Jetstream for finding the quote. Yes indeed, deeper is better for block caving. 
Comment by fordster on Aug 22, 2023 7:37pm
Long hand Strong has breached EVERY ONE of your criticisms btw. It was fantastic training. You guys think your going to say something and no one will challenge you with the facts...you chose the wrong BB. I wake up at 4am everyday and ask myself (regarding every investment I own) Is it time to sell this? I then go back and review why I'm in the investment....Honestly, after all that studying ...more  
Comment by cskhurasu on Aug 22, 2023 9:12pm
I suggest you get a little more sleep fordster...4 am is too early for you to be coherent. Deeper is never better. Block caving is a great technology for accessing deep deposits but the costs go up with the depth. Just common sense.
Comment by cskhurasu on Aug 22, 2023 9:22pm
Will the BC government rescind tunnel permits for KSM which has a PFS, millions of ounces in reserves, an Environmental Assessment Certificate and spends hundreds of millions of dollars hiring First Nations, for a project that does not even have a PEA? 
Comment by Jetstream1281 on Aug 22, 2023 9:28pm
Probably....
Comment by Jetstream1281 on Aug 22, 2023 9:29pm
It's just a matter of time...the gold is there....which trumps a license of occupation.
Comment by Larry60 on Aug 23, 2023 10:23am
No doubt if TUD ever builds an underground mine the only choice will be Block caving.  No oher choice with 0.7g/t Au resource.  At this point, I'd rather there be no copper - it just complicates the metaullurgy/processing at this point. Bt the CAPEX on block caving on mind numbing.   Need to see that it is economic, even if just on a PRELIMINARY basis! "The gold is ...more  
Comment by fordster on Aug 23, 2023 10:28am
As said by a true antagonist 
Comment by CobraShelby on Aug 23, 2023 10:48am
Hello Fordster  Do not worriy about it . Seabridge is a great company with close to 180m total all resoucres, waiting a deal from a major or more than 1 majer because this is so big . In my view that company will get it all for a big giant mine complex for the area. But really wjhat do I know  Even if they are hammering down the .7 GPT  the fact is a lot more better  for ...more  
Comment by CobraShelby on Aug 23, 2023 11:18am
I forgot to add this Table for the Goldstorm deposit as of : Table 1: Summary of Mineral Resources as of March 15, 20231-6 Mine Area Tonnage (Mt) AuEQ (g/t) Au (g/t) Cu (%) Ag (g/t) AuEQ (koz) Au (koz) Cu (Mlb)  ...more  
Comment by fordster on Aug 23, 2023 12:37pm
Cool Shelby...I still believe we will all be owned by the same company with a master plan for the whole complex. It's the only way to do this right...but don't send your cronies over to try to drop our SP Nice charts BTW-thnx my friend. 
Comment by Larry60 on Aug 23, 2023 2:39pm
Shelbys cronies are not dropping TUDs shareprice.   Just no interest right now in TUD in what is overall a very rough junior mkt but hey, lets just enfoy todays sweet smell of Green.  I think we can all agree that we hope there is much more where that came from.  I know I do,
Comment by CobraShelby on Aug 23, 2023 3:39pm
Hello Larry  Not only for Tud but Sea also . D'ont you think Seabridge is worth only 16 dollards per share , it is way under evaluated like all other. In 2010 at a gold price at around 1700 they were close to 35 dollar a share and today they have more than double their reserve since that date . No one has 180 million of Gold ounce in all categories and 50 billion pounds of Cooper , more ...more  
Comment by Jetstream1281 on Aug 23, 2023 5:00pm
Judging by how SEA traded today I wouldn't expect anything earth shattering from Rudi....
Comment by Countrygent on Aug 23, 2023 2:41pm
I wouldn't use "overburden" relating to a potential block cave.  It suggests removal of material at substantial cost.  I believe the term is "subsidence zone" and it will normally run all the way to surface from almost any depth as above the drawbells the rock fractures just keep running vertically.  The resulting subsidence is why no engineered structure can ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities