TSXV:WMG.H - Post by User
Comment by
KonnectTheDotson Aug 08, 2022 12:44pm
67 Views
Post# 34879109
RE:RE:RE:RE:It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future
RE:RE:RE:RE:It's tough to make predictions, especially about the futureThere was no implication made, your inability to correctly interpret leads you to false inferences.
The fact that you try to quash any questions is also a red flag considering your apparent close ties with the conpany.
Results of a submitted sample are meaningless if the provenance of the sample is not proven independently.
It would be easy to do.
Have a representative of the firm doing the analysis watch the process from begining to end, take a sample, analyse it and give a report.
The fact that there has always been such a cone of secrecy over this project gives rise to doubt.
Doubt leads to low confidence.
Low confidence is reflected in the stock price.
$0.155Bid: 0.15 x 58500Ask: 0.16 x 60000Volume: 5,673
If there is nothing to hide why not remove the doubt, instill confidence and give a full cradle to grave independent accounting of metal samples?
BTW...this '?' means question.
You may not have been burned by BreEx but many were, never again.
Also test the feed stock and see what the spectroscopic make up is, watch the process and document the chain of custody, test the metal as well as the byproducts.
That is the only way to prove the process if green which is as important as the metal considering what has been claimed.
Failing to do this will only raise more suspicions, doubt and questions.
As will the constant droning on about secrecy.
Just coming up with the 99.8% whatever number is not giving the full picture (except maybe to you)
Your one sided perspective and defence at any questioning show desperation, not helping the sp.