Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Voltalia Ord Shs VLTAF

Voltalia SA is a France-based holding company engaged in the renewable utilities sector. It designs, develops and operates electric power stations in numerous countries, such as France, French Guyana, Brazil, Greece and Morocco. The Company generates electricity using a variety of renewable energy sources. These include wind, water, biomass and solar power. In addition, Voltalia SA specializes in carbon credit trading activities. The Company operates several subsidiaries, including Anelia and Bio-Bar in France, Voltalia Guyane, SIG Kourou, SIG Mana and SIG Cacao in French Guyana, Voltalia Energia do Brasil in Brazil, Thegero in Greece and Alterrya Maroc in Morocco, among others. The Company is owned by Voltalia Investissement SA.


PINL:VLTAF - Post by User

Comment by eebleron May 11, 2012 9:19am
169 Views
Post# 19898512

RE: RE: Changing Mentality for Catalysts

RE: RE: Changing Mentality for Catalysts

Just in the general sense.  The use of trailing averages helps offset use of current spot prices, they almost always base capex on buying everything brand new versus used or leasing it.  They typically size things out to their ideal production scenario, and then revisit whether it is too much as part of optimization studies.  There are also conservative assumptions built in based on the mine plan, where they have used the average g/t, but for me that is the main thing they can influence where a tradeoff in quantity can be influenced by an increase in the grade, and that is directly in the control of their mine planner.  The assumption for now is avg grade throughput, whereas higher grade immediately changes the payback period.  A 10% improvement in head-grades translates into an additional 35k ozs per year ($52m more cashflow at $1500/oz) with virtually no incremental cost (chemical consumption goes up a bit). 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>